Home ¬Ľ In the Press ¬Ľ Articles ¬Ľ

BBC: Former UN under-secretary general faults US, Israel over Iranian nuclear issue

E-mail Print PDF

30 October 2012

BBC Monitoring European has taken over my article published in the newspaper "L'Unità".
For the readers of my site, here is the text.

Text of report by Italian newspaper L'Unita on 29 October
[Commentary by Pino Arlacchi, former UN under-secretary general, serving European MP for Italy's Democratic Party: "Iranian Nuclear, There Is Not Just Military Solution"]

The disinformation with regards to Iran's nuclear programme has in recent months reached worrying levels. The party supporting war on Iran is more active than ever in the United States, Israel, and Europe. Given that every war is based on a lie - be it great or small - it is important for the public to know about the main features of the lie that is being concocted in order to repeat, 10 years on, the disaster of the war in Iraq.

Many people are convinced that the Iranian Government is pursuing the building of nuclear bombs, and that the only way to stop it is to overwhelm it with sanctions, isolate it, threaten it with military attack, strike at it with the targeted killings of scientists, and with an IT war. According to this way of reasoning, other methods are destined to fail, because the ayatollahs have no intention of engaging in serious negotiations, and only wish to buy time to allow their scientists to make progress towards the building of the bomb.
In the last three years, the US Government, with the complete support of the EU, has been spreading this view of the matter, which has been uncritically endorsed by the Western media and ignores the Iranian position, and downplays or conceals any information on the proposed alternative solutions.

And yet such proposals have indeed been put forward: Two years ago, Iran agreed to a plan by Turkey and Brazil, whereby these countries would receive nuclear material from Iran, which was to be enriched within the limitations of civilian use, and would then return it to Iran. But Obama, after endorsing this proposal, made a shameful U-turn after the Israeli lobby in Washington went crazy. The EU did not say a single word, and when I publicly asked Ms Ashton [EU high representative for foreign policy] about this attitude, all I got was a vague response.

Last year, Russia put forward a plan that imposed restrictions on Iran with regards to enriching uranium, along with more probing inspections on the part of the Vienna-based nuclear agency [refers to IAEA]. Iran was willing to discuss this project, but nothing came of it because the Obama administration's priority was boosting international pressure on Tehran in order to pass new sanctions. There is no report about any European stance on this proposal, all that is known is that the EU has adopted the sanctions called for by the United States.

The result is that Iranian extremists have had an easy task in continuing with their suspicious enrichment of uranium, which has now reached 20 per cent [not further specified]. So, from now onward, any new diplomatic agreement is forced to include ever more invasive monitoring, with an early warning system placed inside Iran's nuclear establishment. This further requisite is essential, because it introduces a breaking point beyond which Iran knows that tougher sanctions will be triggered, as well as military attacks.

But any agreement that includes this requisite must also include a list of very well defined steps that Iran must make in order to obtain the lifting of sanctions. This is what the UN did with Iraq after the first Gulf War, and this agreement worked until the United States decided that its real goal was regime change.

Over the years, Iran has repeatedly offered to accept a regime of invasive inspections, which go deeper than the ones routinely carried out by the UN's atomic agency. Mousavian, until recently the head negotiator, suggested an enrichment threshold equal to 5 per cent, and agreed not to stock on Iranian soil any enriched uranium in excess. In exchange, the United States and its allies would have had to acknowledge Iran's right to enrichment technology, a right that is one of the key points of the Non-Proliferation Treaty, and to gradually dismantle the sanctions.

Have any of our readers ever heard this story being mentioned, if only vaguely? Nothing has ever been known about it because the United States and the EU have obstinately refused in the last three years to seek a negotiated solution with Iran. The negotiations that failed in the spring and the summer demonstrate that if the West has nothing to offer, but is held hostage by the party supporting an armed clash, then after the US presidential elections the world risks finding itself again in the fog of war.

Source: L'Unita, Rome, in Italian 29 Oct 12

 
ItalianEnglish

Mi Presento

Benvenuti nel mio sito. Qui potete farvi un’idea di chi sono, e trovare notizie e documenti sulle mie opere e sui miei giorni.

Pino ArlacchiNon sono una persona complicata. La mia vita pubblica ruota intorno a due cose: il tentativo di capire ciò che mi circonda, da sociologo, e il tentativo di costruire un mondo più decente, da intellettuale e militante politico.

Leggi tutto...
Libri in pdf

Agenda

 


 

 


Facebook

Ultimi Tweet

Segui Pino Arlacchi su YouTube

Featured Articles

Prev Next

I luoghi comuni sui migranti

 La Repubblica, 31 agosto 2017 Lettera al Direttore CARO direttore, mi permetto di dissentire dalle critiche alla sinistra italiana avanzate martedì dal...

Articoli | 06 Sep 2017

Nessuno vuole morire per Kiev. Ed è giusto.

Panorama, 23 feb. 2015 Nella crisi ucraina c'è chi cerca un nemico a tutti i costi, in un delirio antirusso. Ma...

Articoli | 19 Feb 2015

Non armare l'Ucraina

Roma, 9 feb. 2015 di Pino Arlacchi La crisi ucraina è iniziata un anno fa, ed è evidente che la Russia sta...

Articoli | 09 Feb 2015

Tsipras, Arlacchi: "Il mondo sta con lui. Ecco le ragioni politiche, etiche ed economiche"

Roma, 7 feb. 2015 di Pino Arlacchi Uno schieramento larghissimo, che va dai premi Nobel ai maggiori economisti, di destra e di...

Articoli | 08 Feb 2015

Il teatrino incivile dell'informazione italiana

Roma, 30 gen. 2015 di Pino Arlacchi La qualità dell'informazione italiana ha seguito la stessa traiettoria del declino del PIL. Con la...

Articoli | 31 Jan 2015

Draghi, Arlacchi: "Il bazooka dovrebbe finanziare piano di investimenti e non le banche"

Roma, 28 gen. 2015 di Pino Arlacchi Non credo che le misure appena adottate dalla BCE avranno gli stessi effetti del Quantitative...

Articoli | 28 Jan 2015

Grecia, Arlacchi: " Se Syriza vincerà le elezioni la sua vittoria sarà di grande aiuto"

Il successo di Syriza ci aiuterà a creare un'Europa più vicina al cuore dei suoi cittadini.  Roma, 21 gen. 2015 di...

Articoli | 25 Jan 2015

Terrorismo: qualche cifra scomoda

Dei 2.682 attentati avvenuti nell’Unione europea tra il 2006 e il 2013 solo 16 (lo 0,6 per cento) è di...

Articoli | 22 Jan 2015

Terrorismo e disinformazione: lutti selettivi

Il 95% delle vittime del terrorismo sono musulmani, ma noi piangiamo solo quelle di casa nostra. di Pino Arlacchi, 13...

Articoli | 13 Jan 2015

Arlacchi:"Non facciamo il gioco dei terroristi. Islam e Occidente non c'entrano nulla"

Roma, 8 gen 2015 di Pino Arlacchi In campo non ci solo i terroristi che dicono di uccidere in nome dell'Islam e...

Articoli | 08 Jan 2015

Newsletter


Chi è Online

We have 498 guests online

Questo sito utilizza cookie; accedendo o cliccando su "Accetto" acconsenti a scaricare sul tuo browser tutte le tipologie di cookie presenti in questo sito..

Accetto cookie da questo sito.

Info